Hey, I work with a Scandinavian home-design brand whose product belongs to autumn and winter. Cozy season, long dark evenings. The kind of brand where the year gets decided in roughly ten weeks between October and December. Their summer used to follow the script most seasonal brands run. Demand cools in May. ROAS sags. Someone looks at the dashboard, declares that "ads have stopped working," and spend gets cut to almost nothing until September. Then Q4 arrives and the account has to restart cold, rebuilding audiences and re-proving creative at the year's highest CPMs, right when every hour matters. Here's the actual diagnosis, and I mean it kindly: most seasonal brands have a job-description problem, and summer is just where it shows. They've given every month of the year the same job, selling at full efficiency, and then they punish the months that can't do it. Two weeks ago I made the general case that Q4 gets decided now, in the summer. This brand is the extreme version, and the extreme version is where the lesson gets sharp. The panic-pause bills you later. The pixel cools, so October's algorithm spends expensive weeks relearning what July already knew. The list stops growing during exactly the months when subscribers are cheapest. The creative bank stays empty, so November runs unproven ads at peak prices. The summer "savings" get repaid with interest in Q4, and on the dashboard it just looks like a slow start. For this brand, the turn started with one question in a planning call: what would this account do all summer if we banned the word ROAS until September? The answers became the scoreboard below.
Different months have different jobs Peak season has one job: harvest. Convert demand at the highest rate your operations can handle. The off-season's job is making the harvest bigger. Fill the top of the funnel while attention is cheap. Build the email list. Validate the creative concepts you'll scale in October. Warm the audiences that Q4 retargeting will feed on. Judged by peak-season metrics, that work always looks like failure, because you're grading list-building months on selling metrics. The account and the team are identical in July and November. Only the yardstick should change.
The off-season scoreboard Summer performance at this brand now gets judged on four numbers, and blended ROAS is deliberately not one of them: Cost per new email subscriber. Their quiz and lead magnets run all summer, because a subscriber captured in July for cents on the dollar becomes a November buyer at zero extra ad cost. A visitor who won't buy a considered product in July will happily answer six quiz questions about their home, and that email address is worth real money by November. Creative concepts validated. Every winning angle proven cheaply in August is one less experiment running at peak CPMs. Warm-pool size. Engaged visitors, video viewers, and site traffic, the audiences October will convert. And cost per first purchase from new customers, held to a looser off-season threshold on purpose, because a first-time summer buyer is worth far more than their first order once the season turns. None of these numbers look impressive in a weekly report, and all of them decide what your November costs. Boring metrics now, cheaper November later. The math is what makes this an easy call. Attention in July costs a fraction of what the same attention costs in November. Same person, same feed, different auction. I showed you two weeks ago that ad prices are already up 12% in a year, and November stacks the seasonal spike on top of that. Buying your Q4 audiences at July prices is the best trade in ecommerce, and seasonal brands are best positioned to take it, because their competitors all go quiet at the same time.
The second move: soften the season itself Two moves fixed this brand's year. The first was the calendar. The second was the product. Their hero product is a durable: beautiful, long-lasting, bought once. But it burns a consumable, and that changed the revenue curve. Attaching the consumable to every hero purchase, with a subscription option and reorder flows, gave the brand a revenue line that doesn't care what month it is. Durable-product brands almost always have a version of this hiding in plain sight: refills, accessories, care products, replacement parts. Two rules make the attach work. Offer it at the moment of the hero purchase, because the habit forms at checkout and never in a win-back email six months later. And price the refill subscription in plain per-month terms, so the customer's math takes one second. I've written before about the durable-goods retention trap, and how one-purchase brands escape it.
This applies to you even if you think it doesn't Every brand has seasons, just at different amplitudes. Pull your trailing twelve months and check what share of revenue landed in your best ten weeks. Founders consistently guess low here. A brand that "isn't seasonal" with 35% of its year in Q4 is a seasonal brand in denial, and it deserves at least the summer scoreboard, if not the whole system. Run the check before you write this one off as somebody else's email. The operators who get this stop asking "why is summer bad" and start asking "is summer doing its job." Completely different question, much better answers.
Your move this week Three steps, one evening: 1. Name your season honestly. Pull monthly revenue for the last two years and find your real peak weeks. Most founders think they already know these and then get surprised by the edges, especially how early the ramp actually starts. 2. Write the off-season job description. Put the four off-season KPIs (cost per subscriber, concepts validated, warm-pool growth, looser-threshold first purchases) on the same dashboard your team already checks. The placement matters, because a KPI nobody sees is a KPI nobody hits. 3. Find your consumable. If your hero product is a durable, list every refill, accessory, or companion purchase you could attach within 60 days. Pick one and build it. And if the list comes back empty, that's worth knowing too, because it means your retention ceiling is a product question, and no email flow will fix it. The brands that win Q4 treat summer as the season that decides how big winter gets. Talk soon, PS: Reply "season" with your peak weeks (roughly when your year actually happens), and I'll tell you what I'd have your account doing right now instead of waiting. PPS: The brand that bought its audience in July, watching November roll in → |
Join my newsletter for up-to-date ecom growth plays from the trenches. Ads, offers, CRO and everything in-between. So you can finally scale profitably.
Hey, Quick one, and it's worth doing before you close your laptop today. Three of your Meta reports have been empty since August 6th. And nobody sent you an email about it. Because on that date, Meta made 3 reporting breakdowns opt-in per ad account: device, hourly by audience time zone, and frequency. If your account hasn't opted in, those breakdowns return nada. And that's the part that makes it dangerous. They don't fail. There's no error, no warning, no red banner. It just comes back...
Hey, Quick one today. Picture two brands. Same $60 CAC, same $80 first order. On every dashboard you normally look at, they're twins. One of them should double spend going into Q4. The other one is slowly dying, and the difference lives in a number most founders have never pulled: what a new customer is worth by day 90. If you read the scorecard email two weeks ago, this is one of the two numbers the question marks always cluster on. Brand one's customers come back. By day 90, the average new...
I have to show you an embarrassing number from my own dashboard. In June, my email list grew by exactly one subscriber. One. The whole month. And I only noticed because I was in the data for a different reason. The irony wasn't lost on me. A few weeks earlier I'd audited a skincare brand and found their ad account had stopped acquiring new customers while every dashboard glowed green. I wrote a whole newsletter about it. Meanwhile my own list was doing the same thing: totals holding steady,...